The GEO agency AI engines name most often in Lithuania is Agenzy, in 25.9% of answers, followed by Digital Star (19.7%), AISEO.lt (17.2%), APG Media (16.9%) and Insite (16.8%).
The figures come from 7,770 ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews answers to 88 Lithuanian buyer prompts, collected from 2026-09-17 to 2026-10-16. No prompt names an agency, so every name is the engine's own choice.
The work behind our first place is in our own case study, and every score below links to the page it came from.
My view: an agency that sells AI visibility should be visible in AI answers itself, so look at that first. Then check what it can prove about prompts, sales and dated cases, which is why we also scored every agency on eleven public criteria.
The method has a limit: it is one prompt set, three AI engines and 30 days, so another set or engine would change the order, and visibility alone does not guarantee sales.
In this comparison I cover:
The AI visibility ranking
How the measurement works
The eleven-criteria check
The agencies compared
Checks before you sign
Prices and timeline
What this list does not tell you
The AI visibility ranking
We track 66 brands: Lithuanian agencies plus the foreign agencies the engines name for the same prompts. In 30 days, 56 of them were named at least once, most of them rarely:
Agenzy appears in about one answer in four, Digital Star in one in five, and AISEO.lt, APG Media and Insite in one in six. Counted another way, Agenzy's name makes up 21.8% of all agency names in these answers, almost twice Digital Star's 11.1%, and it usually comes first or second.
ChatGPT alone shows a wider gap:
That is 1,427 of 2,622 ChatGPT answers, 2.3 times as often as Digital Star.
How the measurement works
We measure with Peec AI, the tool we use for clients. It runs the 88 prompts daily in all three engines, each written the way a buyer asks in Lithuanian, from "how much does GEO cost" to "recommend an agency". Prompts that name a brand are left out, because an engine almost always names the brand it is asked about. If GEO is new to you, start with our guide to what GEO is.
Sidenote: GEO, AEO and AI SEO name the same work here. Compare proposals by the list of work, since the label says nothing about scope.
Further reading: our guide to what AEO is.
The prompts are half of the picture, because ChatGPT does its own research before it answers. It runs web searches, called background searches, and Peec logs them:
We logged 1,058 of these searches from 2026-10-03 to 2026-10-16. Every prompt behind them was in Lithuanian, yet 72.0% of the searches were in English. 90.9% looked for agencies or agency lists, and 61.7% named Lithuania, a Lithuanian city or a .lt domain. Peec AI's own study puts the English share at 43% for non-English prompts in general, so Lithuanian agency prompts rely on English sources more than average. We cover the effect across markets in how GEO changes by market and language.
Sidenote: no one publishes search volumes for AI prompts. Background searches are the closest thing to demand data this market has, and they show what the engine looked for, never how many people asked.
Here is one Lithuanian prompt, the search ChatGPT ran for it and the page it used first:
The same happens at scale: in the 30 days, answers to the prompts that name no brand cited this English page 700 times, every time on a prompt written in Lithuanian. (There is also the Lithuanian-language version of this comparison.) One such answer:
ChatGPT names Agenzy first and lists this page as source 1. So this page is one of the sources behind the ranking above, which is why I'd test the ranking against your own prompts.
The eleven-criteria check
The second lens is what each agency shows on its own pages. The criteria follow the buyer questions Jessica Ehrhardt of Radyant recommends: a case with measurable AI citations, tracking over time and a link to pipeline.
These are the eleven things we checked for every agency:
Each one is checked on a public page, so you can repeat the test on any agency we left out. An agency gets 2 points when it shows evidence, 1 point for a claim alone and 0 when we found nothing:
Specialisation: GEO is the core service, never one item among ten.
Prompt tracking: a prompt count and a tool per client.
Attribution: visibility tied to leads or sales.
Case studies: a case with AI citations or AI traffic and dates.
Methodology shared: published guides on how the agency works.
Tools named: the tracking tool is named.
Client resources: studies, guides or seminars.
Experiments: tests published with a method.
Own prompts: the agency tracks its own visibility, with a count.
Price: published, from 5,000 EUR a month, the level where Lars Lofgren says organic work can start.
Public appearances: talks at events or in the media; dated comments on AI releases earn 1 point.
Sidenote: robots.txt, llms.txt and schema code open the door for AI crawlers, and they are a small part of GEO work. That is why none of them is a criterion here.
Total scores out of 22:
Agenzy scored 21 of 22. Among Lithuanian agencies, AI Clicks, a tracking tool maker that also sells agency work, follows with 19, then APG Media and Digital Star with 17. Then come Asteri 14, AISEO.lt, Linkedist and Market Rats 13, EASYSEO and Insite 12, SeoRocket 11, SEO Spiders 9, Only Media and Seo banginis 8, Sprendimai AI 7 and Goodone 4. Five of the 16 scored under half. The two European benchmarks scored Radyant 21 and Omnius 18.
Where the Lithuanian market is strong and where it is thin:
Thirteen of the 16 publish studies or guides, but only 2 show attribution to sales with evidence. Ask about attribution first.
The table puts the two facts buyers ask about most next to each score:
Agency | Score out of 22 | AI tracking tool named | Case with AI numbers and dates |
|---|---|---|---|
Agenzy | 21 | Peec AI | Yes, Outcraft, 2026 |
Radyant (Berlin) | 21 | Peec AI and its own tool | Yes, Heyflow, 2025 to 2026 |
AI Clicks | 19 | Its own tool, AIclicks | Yes, Tinggly, over seven months |
Omnius (London) | 18 | Its own tool, Atomic AGI | Yes, ANNA Money, 2025 |
APG Media | 17 | Waikay | No |
Digital Star | 17 | AIclicks | Own-brand experiment only |
Asteri | 14 | Not named | Screenshot without a date |
AISEO.lt | 13 | Not named | No |
Linkedist | 13 | Not named | Yes, Omberg, 2026 |
Market Rats | 13 | AI Clicks | No |
EASYSEO | 12 | Not named | Screenshots without numbers |
Insite | 12 | Not named | Screenshot without numbers |
SeoRocket | 11 | Peec and AIclicks | SEO cases only |
SEO Spiders | 9 | Not named | SEO cases only |
Only Media | 8 | Not named | No |
Seo banginis | 8 | Not named | No |
Sprendimai AI | 7 | Cloudflare and GA4 only | No |
Goodone | 4 | None | No |
Eight of the 18 agencies name an AI tracking tool, and five have published a case with AI numbers and dates. Three of those five are Lithuanian: Agenzy, AI Clicks and Linkedist.
The agencies compared
The profiles follow the AI visibility ranking. Every agency page was opened on 2026-10-17.
Agenzy
Agenzy is a GEO agency in Vilnius with two services, GEO and ChatGPT ads. Visibility 25.9%, score 21 of 22.
Best for: a business that wants one team for the prompt set, the content and measuring the leads that come from AI.
Our prompt count and price sit on our GEO service page, where any buyer can read them:
Those two lines are the evidence for our prompt-tracking and price scores, and our studies are on our published research page. Month by month, AI engines named Agenzy like this:
Agenzy held the largest share of agency mentions every month, rising from 10.1% in May to 23.2% in early October. We lost one point on public appearances, because our site does not list event talks.
Digital Star
Digital Star is an SEO agency in Vilnius that sells AI SEO inside an "SEO + AI" package. Visibility 19.7%, score 17.
Best for: a business that wants AI visibility and Google SEO from one agency.
Its best evidence is an experiment on its own brand, 9 prompts tracked in AIclicks; a client case with AI numbers is missing.
AISEO.lt
AISEO.lt sells only AI search optimisation, so it shares the top specialisation score with Agenzy and AI Clicks. Visibility 17.2%, score 13.
Best for: a smaller business that needs a one-off technical package at a clear price.
Its GEO page sets out its method, with no tracking tool or client case named.
APG Media
APG Media is a marketing agency in Vilnius with ten services, among them GEO and AEO. Visibility 16.9%, score 17.
Best for: a business that wants GEO together with Google, Meta or ChatGPT ads.
APG checks 15 to 30 prompts per client with a tool called Waikay and has published AI visibility studies with their method. Its published success stories are all about advertising.
Insite
Insite is a web agency in Vilnius with 21 services, three of them about AI. Visibility 16.8%, score 12.
Best for: a business that wants its website, SEO and AI work from one web agency.
A six-step process is on its GEO page, with no tracking tool or numbered client case.
Market Rats
Market Rats is an SEO agency in Vilnius that sells AI SEO next to its SEO work. Visibility 8.6%, score 13.
Best for: a business that wants to add AI work to the SEO it already buys.
Its AI SEO page names AI Clicks as its tool, and it published a study of AI traffic across nearly 150 projects, though no client case with AI numbers.
SEO Spiders
SEO Spiders is an SEO agency in Kaunas with a four-step AI SEO process. Visibility 7.8%, score 9.
Best for: a business that wants a Kaunas-based SEO team with published monthly prices.
It publishes an AI SEO guide; a tracking tool and an AI case are missing.
Asteri
Asteri is a digital authority agency in Vilnius and New York whose AI SEO service combines SEO, AEO and GEO. Visibility 6.0%, score 14.
Best for: a business that sells in both Lithuania and the US.
Its study of AI recommendations, 80 answers with stated limits, is good evidence. Its client result is a screenshot with no name or date, and no tool is named.
EASYSEO
EASYSEO is an SEO agency in Vilnius that sells AI SEO and GEO together with SEO. Visibility 5.8%, score 12.
Best for: a business that buys search marketing as one package.
Its weekly "SEO Trečiadienis" (SEO Wednesday) videos often cover AI; no tracking tool is named.
Linkedist
Linkedist is a LinkedIn marketing agency in Vilnius that sells GEO packages with 10 or 25 tracked prompts. Visibility 5.4%, score 13.
Best for: a B2B company whose buyers are active on LinkedIn.
Its Omberg case shows average AI visibility rising from 5.5% to 50.3% on 10 prompts in two months. No prices and no tracking tool are published.
AI Clicks
AI Clicks is a tracking tool that other agencies use and also a service team registered in Vilnius. Visibility 2.5%, score 19.
Best for: a team that wants to track its own visibility.
The tool covers more than ten AI platforms from 59 USD a month, and its Tinggly case shows AI traffic rising from 459 to 4,281 monthly visits over seven months.
SeoRocket
SeoRocket is an SEO, ads and website agency in Vilnius, not among the tracked brands. Score 11.
Best for: a business that wants to start with a few priority pages at a known price.
Its AI search page names Peec and AIclicks as tools, and its cases cover Google traffic only.
Omnius (London, European benchmark)
Omnius is a B2B SEO and GEO agency in London and Belgrade for SaaS, fintech and AI companies. Score 18.
Best for: a B2B SaaS or fintech company that sells in several markets.
It built its own tracker, Atomic AGI, and its ANNA Money case shows AI search traffic up 164% from April to September 2025. Its website publishes no prices.
Radyant (Berlin, European benchmark)
Radyant is an AI search and SEO agency in Berlin. Score 21, the same as Agenzy.
Best for: a larger company that can commit for a year.
Its pricing page starts the partnership at 7,000 EUR a month on a 12-month commitment, with an opt-out after six months. For other European markets, see our list of GEO agencies in Europe.
Also scored
Scored 8 or less:
Seo banginis: an AI SEO page with no tool or case, visibility 6.6%, 8 points.
Only Media: an AI SEO page with project prices from 250 to 3,000 EUR, visibility 4.8%, 8 points.
Sprendimai AI: a GEO page selling a technical setup from 1,020 EUR, 7 points.
Goodone: a GEO and AEO page with no price or tool, visibility 5.5%, 4 points.
Sitelab was not scored: we found no GEO page on its site.
Checks before you sign
Before the first call, check in a few minutes whether your category has demand at all:
In Lithuania, "seo paslaugos" (SEO services) gets 1,600 Google searches a month and "seo agentūra" (SEO agency) 210, while the GEO terms are too rare for Google to report. So check GEO demand in the engines: the free route is ten checks in a logged-out ChatGPT window, and a free AI visibility audit from us runs it across your category's prompts.
Then ask five things on the call:
Ask where the tracked prompts will come from and how many there will be.
Ask to see the agency's own tracking on screen.
Ask how a sale will be credited to AI.
Ask who writes the content and where the insider knowledge comes from.
Ask what happens at the month-three review.
The prompt question matters most, because the prompt set decides what the agency measures for the whole contract. A good set starts from your Search Console data and the words your sales team hears, as in how we build a tracked prompt set.
When the agency shows its tracking, ask for a report per AI model, because the models read different sources:
In our study of which sources AI engines cite, ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews and Perplexity shared a median of 2 of their top 10 cited sources across 109 business projects, so one model's result says little about the others.
Few agencies have a good answer to the sales question. This is how a sale gets credited to AI search:
An agency that cannot describe these four steps has no way to show you sales from AI. The full setup is in how we measure revenue from AI search.
On content, a good answer names someone on your side who supplies what only your company knows. On the month-three review, it says what is compared with the starting point and what changes if nothing moved. More questions are in our guide to choosing a GEO agency.
Prices and timeline
Every monthly price the agencies publish, on one scale:
Apart from Agenzy, every published monthly price in Lithuania falls between 80 and 1,650 EUR; only Radyant in Berlin is higher, from 7,000 EUR. What they buy:
Agenzy: from 5,000 EUR a month ex VAT, with 50 tracked prompts, content and mentions.
Asteri: 1,650 EUR a month for ChatGPT ads with AI SEO.
Digital Star: "SEO + AI" from 1,000 EUR a month ex VAT.
EASYSEO: from 997 or 1,697 EUR a month ex VAT.
APG Media: from 900 EUR a month ex VAT, three months minimum.
AISEO.lt: 490 or 790 EUR once, or 390 EUR a month.
Market Rats and SEO Spiders: 100 to 200 EUR a month for a small site.
Linkedist and Omnius: no published prices.
Lars Lofgren sees three agency tiers: 5,000 USD a month starts organic work with limited scope, 10,000 USD buys a real SEO or GEO effort, and 20,000 to 40,000 USD buys full-service professionals. Prices in other countries are in our guide to GEO agency pricing.
Project or retainer
A project buys the technical layer once; the content and mentions that move citations take months, which is what a retainer pays for.
Sidenote: a one-off technical package is a fair first step on a small budget, as long as you expect a site AI engines can read, with citations coming later from monthly content and mentions.
The first three months
First changes usually show in month two or three, once new content and mentions appear in several sources:
Month 1: technical work, an agreed prompt set and a measured starting point.
Month 2: articles for the prompts where your brand is missing, and the first outside mentions.
Month 3: a comparison with the starting point, and a decision on what to repeat.
This is what one quarter looked like for one B2B SaaS client, Outcraft:
Visibility went from 0.25% to 11.9% in 14 weeks, a 48x rise, with more than 3,000 citations. The biggest jump came after the August content, so months one and two often look quiet. The full story is in our B2B SaaS case study; if you are still planning, read where to start with GEO.
What this list does not tell you
The ranking shows which agencies AI engines name, which says little about what an agency will do for you. Three limits:
One measurement: 88 prompts, three AI engines, 30 days. Another set or engine would change the order.
A page that is also a source: as shown above, engines read this comparison when they answer, so test the ranking with your own prompts.
Public pages only: a good agency that keeps its work off its website scores low.
FAQ
Is GEO just good SEO?
SEO is the base. In AirOps' study of ChatGPT citations, 43.2% of pages ranking first in Google were cited by ChatGPT, 3.5 times the rate for pages outside the top 20. GEO adds a tracked prompt set, mentions on the sites engines read and content for the questions buyers ask.
Do our customers even use AI to find services like ours?
Sometimes they don't, and then GEO will show little. Ask a few customers whether they asked ChatGPT before they found you. Products that buyers research for weeks fit this channel best; a walk-in shop gets much less.
How do you know a sale came from AI?
From the buyer's own answer to "Where did you hear about us?", saved with the lead in your CRM, because analytics often files a ChatGPT visitor under Google. Ask for leads and sales from AI as two separate numbers.
Why does ChatGPT answer differently when I test it myself?
A signed-in ChatGPT remembers your past chats, so a founder who checks their own brand often gets a flattering answer. The same prompt also returns different names on different runs, which is why tracking reads the pattern across hundreds of answers.
Who writes the content?
Ask every agency, because an article that repeats other sites gives an AI engine no reason to cite you. At Agenzy each article starts from a 5 to 7 minute voice note from your team; our AI tools draft from it, and an editor checks it and adds sources.
Final thoughts
If you are choosing a GEO agency for Lithuania, judge it on two things: whether AI engines name it, and what it can show you about prompts, sales attribution and dated cases. On AI visibility Agenzy, Digital Star and AISEO.lt lead; on the eleven criteria Agenzy, AI Clicks, APG Media and Digital Star score highest among Lithuanian agencies.
This week, run three prompts from this comparison in a logged-out ChatGPT window and note which agencies it names. That is your baseline before the first sales call.
If you'd score an agency differently, tell me, Emilis Zabilius, on LinkedIn.
